Artemus Ward 
Deciding to Leave [PDF ebook] 
The Politics of Retirement from the United States Supreme Court

Soporte

While much has been written on Supreme Court appointments, Deciding to Leave provides the first systematic look at the process by which justices decide to retire from the bench, and why this has become increasingly partisan in recent years. Since 1954, generous retirement provisions and decreasing workloads have allowed justices to depart strategically when a president of their own party occupies the White House. Otherwise, the justices remain in their seats, often past their ability to effectively participate in the work of the Court. While there are benefits and drawbacks to various reform proposals, Ward argues that mandatory retirement goes farthest in combating partisanship and protecting the institution of the Court.

€36.99
Métodos de pago

Tabla de materias

List of Illustrations and Tables

Preface

1. The Politics of Departure in the U.S. Supreme Court


Departure in Comparative Perspective
Departure Politics in Historical Context
Overview


2. 1789–1800: Traveling Postboys


Indisposition and the Early Supreme Court
Disagreeable Tours
Conclusion


3. 1801–1868: Crippled Courts


Army of Judges
Imminent Danger of Sudden Death
Needy and Half-Paid Men
Abridgement of Tenure, Facility of Removal, or Some Other Modification
If Mr. Clay Had Been Elected
Overview


4. 1869–1896: Old Imbeciles on the Bench


Dangerous in its Operation
1869 Retirement Act
The Disputed Election of 1876
The Evarts Act
Conclusion


5. 1897–1936: Old Fools and Young Spirits


The Field Effect
Evarts Act Redux
Increased Caseloads
Conclusion


6. 1937–1954: Senior Status


A War with a Fool at the Top
1937 Retirement Act
Untimely Deaths
Conclusion


7. 1954–1970: The Limits of Power


1954 Retirement Act
Cantankerous Fellows
An Extraconstitutional Arrangement
Conclusion


8. 1971–1999: Appointed for Life


He Ought to Get Off the Court Too
Old and Coming Apart
Conclusion


9. 2000–Present: A Self-Inflicted Wound


The Disputed Election of 2000
That’s For Me to Know and You to Find Out
Conclusion


10. Conclusion: Imaginary Danger?


Ability and Inability
The Rule of 100
Lightening the Burden
Mandatory Retirement
Conclusion


Appendix A


Letter from Byron White to Warren Burger, Oct. 20, 1975


Appendix B


Letter from Warren E. Burger, William J. Brennan, Jr., Potter Stewart, Byron R. White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry A. Blackmun, Lewis F. Powell, and William H. Rehnquist to William O. Douglas, December 22, 1975


Appendix C


Letter from John Paul Stevens to William H. Rehnquist, October 28, 1988


Notes

Bibliography

Index

Sobre el autor

Artemus Ward is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Northern Illinois University.

¡Compre este libro electrónico y obtenga 1 más GRATIS!
Idioma Inglés ● Formato PDF ● Páginas 358 ● ISBN 9780791487228 ● Tamaño de archivo 2.3 MB ● Editorial State University of New York Press ● Publicado 2012 ● Descargable 24 meses ● Divisa EUR ● ID 7665207 ● Protección de copia Adobe DRM
Requiere lector de ebook con capacidad DRM

Más ebooks del mismo autor / Editor

118.426 Ebooks en esta categoría