Simone de Beauvoir’s Le Deuxi_me Sexe has been studied extensively since its appearance in 1949. Through the years, certain passages have taken on prestige; others are seen as unimportant to understanding Beauvoir’s argument. In Toward a Phenomenology of Sexual Difference, Sara Hein Smaa rediscovers those neglected passages in her quest to follow Beauvoir’s line of thinking. Hein Smaa, like some other recent philosophers, finds that Le Duexi_me Sexe is a philosophical inquiry, not the empirical study it is commonly thought to be. Others who view Beauvoir’s masterpiece as a work of philosophy argue it is a criticism not only of Sartrean phenomenology, but of phenomenology as a whole. Hein Smaa thinks differently. She finds that Beauvoir’s starting point is the Husserlian idea of the living body that she found developed in Merleau-Ponty’s Ph Znom Znologie de la perception. So when Beavoir wrote Le Duexi_me Sexe, she was writing not as Sartre’s pupil, but as a scholar in the tradition of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty.