This timely collection brings together philosophical, legal and sociological perspectives on the crucial question of who should make decisions about the fate of a child suffering from a serious illness. In particular, the collection looks at whether the current »best interests » threshold is the appropriate boundary for legal intervention, or whether it would be more appropriate to adopt the »risk of significant harm » approach proposed in
Gard. It explores the roles of parents, doctors and the courts in making decisions on behalf of children, actively drawing on perspectives from the clinic as well as academia and practice. In doing so, it teases out the potential risks of inappropriate state intrusion in parental decision-making, and considers how we might address them.
Cressida (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Auckland & Dr Imogen (University of Oxford, Oxford) Goold
Parental Rights, Best Interests and Significant Harms [PDF ebook]
Medical Decision-Making on Behalf of Children Post-Great Ormond Street Hospital v Gard
Parental Rights, Best Interests and Significant Harms [PDF ebook]
Medical Decision-Making on Behalf of Children Post-Great Ormond Street Hospital v Gard
Achetez cet ebook et obtenez-en 1 de plus GRATUITEMENT !
Format PDF ● Pages 256 ● ISBN 9781509924905 ● Éditeur Cressida (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Auckland & Dr Imogen (University of Oxford, Oxford) Goold ● Maison d’édition Bloomsbury Publishing ● Publié 2019 ● Téléchargeable 3 fois ● Devise EUR ● ID 7254960 ● Protection contre la copie Adobe DRM
Nécessite un lecteur de livre électronique compatible DRM