called in question, then naturally no fact, science, could be presupposed. Thus Plato was set on the path to the pure idea. Not gathered from the de facto sciences but formative of pure norms, his dialectic of pure ideas-as we say, his logic or his theory of science – was called on to make genuine 1 science possible now for the first time, to guide its practice. And precisely in fulfilling this vocation the Platonic dialectic actually helped create sciences in the pregnant sense, sciences that were consciously sustained by the idea of logical science and sought to actualize it so far as possible. Such were the strict mathematics and natural science whose further developments at higher stages are our modem sciences. But the original relationship between logic and science has undergone a remarkable reversal in modem times. The sciences made themselves independent. Without being able to satisfy completely the spirit of critical self-justification, they fashioned extremely differentiated methods, whose fruitfulness, it is true, was practically certain, but whose productivity was not clarified by ultimate insight. They fashioned these methods, not indeed with the everyday man’s naivete, but still with a na!ivete of a higher level, which abandoned the appeal to the pure idea, the justifying of method by pure principles, according to ultimate a priori possibilities and necessities.
Edmund Husserl
Formal and transcendental logic [PDF ebook]
Formal and transcendental logic [PDF ebook]
Koop dit e-boek en ontvang er nog 1 GRATIS!
Taal Engels ● Formaat PDF ● ISBN 9789401749008 ● Uitgeverij Springer Netherlands ● Gepubliceerd 2013 ● Downloadbare 3 keer ● Valuta EUR ● ID 4708293 ● Kopieerbeveiliging Adobe DRM
Vereist een DRM-compatibele e-boeklezer