Vincent Gruis & Sasha Tsenkova 
Management of Privatised Housing [PDF ebook] 
International Policies and Practice

The sale of public and social housing has been a major aspect of housing policies in recent decades. Privatisation and a general retreat by governments from the housing arena have pushed up sales; this has been particularly evident within Eastern European countries and China but is also taking place in many Western European countries and Australia.

Wherever it occurs, such privatisation has lead to new challenges for housing management. Many estates are now a mix of public and private, raising questions about the division of responsibilities between different owners. Legislation to address this is not adequate and public managers are still hampered by the bureaucratic mechanisms within their organisations, while the new owners are not used to their responsibilities for maintenance. Added to this are the limited financial resources for renewal and maintenance among both public and private owners at a time when the need for investments is urgent, especially within the massive housing estates dating from the communist era.

Experts from Australia, France, the Netherlands, UK, Switzerland, China, the Czech Republic, Moldavia, Russia, Serbia and Slovenia present their county’s context and the policies and practice for managing privatised housing, together with case studies illustrating the issues described.

How privatised public housing is managed is of international concern, which will benefit from an international exchange of knowledge and best practice. The comparative analysis offered in Management of Privatised Housing: International Policies & Practice makes a significant contribution to the literature on this important topic.

Inhoudsopgave

INTRODUCTION: Conceptual Framework.

Part I – CASE STUDIES FROM WESTERN EUROPE AND
AUSTRALIA.

England, The Netherlands, France, Switzerland, Australia.

.

Part II – CASE STUDIES FROM EASTERN EUROPE AND CHINA.

Serbia, The Czech Republic, Slovenia, Russia, Moldova,
China.

.

POST-PRIVATISATION IN HOUSING: POLICY AND RESEACH AGENDA.

In order to facilitate cross-national analyses, all chapters are
written according to the same general format. This format consists
of four sections:.

Section 1: Description of national housing context in country
X.

– a description of the national composition of the housing stock
according to tenure, size, and dwelling type, supported by
statistics;.

– a general description of the housing system: which
organisations develop and manage the housing stock; what are
government regulations for housing development and management
concerning rent setting, allocations, sales, maintenance and
renewal, and tenant involvement; how are the landlords supervised
(by whom and on what basis); what financial support exists for
housing management, renewal and development (exploitation grants,
subsidies for renewals, government loans, government guarantees,
housing grants)?.

– a general description of the situation on the housing market:
shortages and surpluses according region, dwelling type, tenure and
price.

– a reflection on the occurrence of housing problems,
problematic neighbourhoods, vacancies, etc..

Section 2: Privatisation in country X.

– a reflection on the privatisation policies in the past
decades;.

– description on the occurrence of privatisation, supported by
statistics of the pace of privatisation (quantities);.

– a description of the conditions under which dwellings were
sold: price and the division of management responsibilities between
landlords and homeowner;.

– an analysis of the challenges for maintenance and renewal of
the partly-privatised estates;.

– an analysis of the institutional, organisational, cultural,
social and financial problems of management;.

– policies and (innovative) practices that have been or are
being implemented to deal with these problems..

Section 3: Case study.

Describes one or more case studies of partly privatised estates.
These cases may be selected on the basis of their representation of
common problems and/or solutions in country X and/or on the basis
of the innovative ‘best practice’ approach that has
been undertaken to deal with the problems. The section about the
case study will consist of:.

– a description the estate (quality, division according to
tenure, price, position on the housing market);.

– a reflection on the privatisation process (pace, background,
conditions);.

– a description of social, functional and technical problems
that occur in the estate and the problems of management,
maintenance and renewal;.

– a reflection on to what extent the above problems are caused
or increased by the privatisation;.

– a reflection on the initiatives that have been and will be
undertaken to cope with the problems and their (expected)
success..

Section 4: Conclusion.

Contains a brief summary of the chapter plus an outlook for the
future problems/challenges.

Over de auteur

Editors:

Vincent Gruis is assistant professor of housing at Delft
University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Department of
Real Estate & Housing. He has a Ph D in Housing and conducts
research and is a consultant in the area of housing management and
urban renewal. Dr. Gruis has published extensively in well-known
international and national journals on housing and his teaching
includes MSc courses on Urban Development, Housing Management,
Housing Policy and Urban Management.

Sasha Tsenkova is professor of international development at the
University of Calgary, Canada. She has a Ph Ds in Architecture and
in Planning. Her research and consultancy experience in housing
policy and urban development in more than 30 countries in North
America, Western and Eastern Europe and South-east Asia. She is a
consultant to the World Bank, the United Nations in New York and
Geneva, the Canadian International Development Agency and the
Council of Europe.

Contributors:

Frederic Bougrain – Centre Scientifique et Technique du
Bâtiment, France

Limei Chen – City University of Hong Kong, China

Patrick Dogge – Trudo housing association, The Netherlands

Martin Lux – Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences, Czech
Republic

Vivienne Milligan – Australian Housing & Urban Research
Institute, University of Sydney, Australia

Alan Murie – University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

Djordje Mojovic – UN Habitat, Serbia

David Ousby – Prospect Row LLP, United Kingdom

Maria Plotnikova – Centre for Public Policy for Regions,
University of Strathclyde & University of Glasgow, United
Kingdom

Bill Randolph – City Futures Research Centre, University of New
South Wales, Australia

Richard Sendi – Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of
Slovenia, Slovenia

Jos Smeets – University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Rob Soeterbroek – University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Joris E. van Wezemael – University of Zurich, Switzerland