An up-to-date discussion of early Christian paraenesis in its Graeco-Roman and Hellenistic Jewish contexts in the light of one hundred years of scholarship, issuing from a research project by Nordic and international scholars.
The concept of paraenesis is basic to New Testament scholarship but hardly anywhere else. How is that to be explained? The concept is also, notoriously, without any agreed-upon definition and it is even contested. Can it at all be salvaged? This volume reassesses the scholarly discussion of paraenesis — both the concept and the phenomenon — since Paul Wendland and Martin Dibelius and argues for a number of ways in which it may continue to be fruitful.
Содержание
Troels Engberg-Pedersen/James M. Starr: Introduction
I. What is Paraenesis?
Popkes: Paraenesis in the New Testament: An Exercise in Conceptuality · Troels Engberg-Pedersen: The Concept of Paraenesis · James M. Starr: Was Paraenesis for Beginners? · Diana Swancutt: Paraenesis in Light of Protrepsis: Troubling the Typical Dichotomy
II. Paraenesis in the Jewish and Graeco-Roman World
Johannes Thomas: The Paraenesis of the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs between Torah and Jewish Wisdom · Stephen Westerholm: Four Maccabees: A Paraenetic Address? · H.D. Betz: Paraenesis and the Concept of God According to Oratio XII (Olympikos) of Dio of Prusa
III. Paraenesis in the New Testament
Reidar Aasgaard: ‘Brotherly Advice’: Christian Siblingship and New Testament Paraenesis · Anders Klostergaard Petersen: Paraenesis in Pauline Scholarship and in Paul — An Intricate Relationship · Abraham J. Malherbe: Paraenesis in the Epistle to Titus · Walter Übelacker: Paraenesis or Paraklesis — Hebrews as a Test-Case · Lauri Thurén: Motivation as the Core of Paraenesis — Remarks on Peter and Paul as Persuaders · Karl Olav Sandnes: Revised Conventions in Early Christian Paraenesis — ‘Working Good’ in 1 Peter · Jonas Holmstrand: Is There Paraenesis in 1 John?
IV. Early Christian Paraenesis after the New Testament
Clarence E. Glad: The Rhetoric of Moral Exhortation in Clement’s Pedagogue · David Hellholm and Vemund Blomkvist: Parainesis as an Ancient Genre-Designation: The Case of the ‘Euthalian Apparatus’ and the ‘Affiliated Argumenta’ · Samuel Rubenson: Wisdom, Paraenesis and the Roots of Monasticism
Об авторе
Troels Engberg-Pedersen is Professor of New Testament at the Faculty of Theology, Copenhagen University, Denmark. James M. Starr is Lecturer of Exegetic Theology (New Testament) at Johannelund Theological Seminary, Uppsala, Sweden.