автор: William V. Gehrlein

поддержка
Dr. William V. Gehrlein is currently Professor Emeritus at University of Delaware (US), which he has been affiliated with since 1978.  He has received a number of grants and awards, and has served on two journal editorial boards. His research interests have spanned the topics of statistics, operations management, and graph theory; with a primary focus on social choice theory.  He has authored more than 150 publications, along with several books and edited volumes. Dr. Dominique Lepelley received his Ph.D in Economics from the University of Caen. He is currently Professor at the University of La Réunion (France). He is primarily interested in social choice theory. More specifically, his work examines the properties of voting procedures and electoral systems. He served as a member of the editorial board of the journal Social Choice and Welfare and has authored more than 80 publications, including two books and one edited volume.




4 Электронные книги William V. Gehrlein

William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley: Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes
This monograph studies voting procedures based on the probability that paradoxical outcomes like the famous Condorcet Paradox might exist. It is well known that hypothetical examples of many differ …
PDF
английский
€106.99
William V. Gehrlein: Condorcet’s Paradox
Condorcet’s Paradox has been formally studied by an amazing number of people in many different contexts for more than two centuries. Peter Fishburn introduced the basic notion of the Paradox to me in …
PDF
английский
€96.29
Steven Brams & William V. Gehrlein: The Mathematics of Preference, Choice and Order
Peter Fishburn has had a splendidly productive career that led to path-breaking c- tributions in a remarkable variety of areas of research. His contributions have been published in a vast literature, …
PDF
английский
€160.49
William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley: Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence
The likelihood of observing Condorcet’s Paradox is known to be very low for elections with a small number of candidates if voters’ preferences on candidates reflect any significant degree of a number …
PDF
английский
€128.39