Drawing on the theories of Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, and others who have written on the history of sexuality and the body, Galileo’s Pendulum explores how the emergence of the scientific method in the seventeenth century led to a de-emphasis on the body and sexuality. The first half of the book focuses on the historical modeling of the relation between pleasure and knowledge by examining a history of scientific rationality and its relation to the formation of the modern scientist’s subjectivity. Relying on Foucault’s history of sexuality, the author hypothesizes that Galileo’s pendulum, as an extension of mathematics and the body, must have been sexualized by schemes of historical representation to the same extent that such schemes were rationalized by Galileo. The second half of the book explores the problems of scientific methodology and attempts to return the body in an explicit way to scientific practice. Ultimately, Galileo’s Pendulum offers a discursive method and praxis for resexualizing the history of Galilean science.
สารบัญ
Foreword by Michael Lynch
Acknowledgments
Introduction
PART ONE: PLEASURE
1. Time, Pleasure, and Knowledge
2. The Perversion of Objectivity and the Objectivity of Perversion
3. The Jesuits’ Homosocial Ties and the Experiments with Galileo’s Pendulum
PART TWO: PEDAGOGY
4. The ‘Body-Instrument Link’ and the Prism: A Case Study
5. The Formal Structure of Galileo’s Pendulum
6. The Respecification of Galileo’s Pendulum
Conclusion
Notes
Index
เกี่ยวกับผู้แต่ง
Dusûan I. BjelicŒ is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Southern Maine and the coeditor (with Obrad SavicŒ) of
Balkan as Metaphor: Between Globalization and Fragmentation.
หนังสืออิเล็กทรอนิกส์เพิ่มเติมจากผู้แต่งคนเดียวกัน / บรรณาธิการ
4,642 หนังสืออิเล็กทรอนิกส์ในหมวดหมู่นี้
