The social sciences have a legitimacy problem in the modern world. The natural sciences are viewed as ‘proper science’ by journalists and policy-makers because they discover ‘truths’, make money, and help governments solve problems. In turn, defenders of the social sciences borrow the language of instrumentality, profit and policy impact. Karl Spracklen, by contrast, makes the moral case for the social sciences, arguing that they are a necessary social good capable of fighting inequality and revealing the workings of hegemonic power.
สารบัญ
Introduction
1. The Attack on Social Sciences
2. The Weakness of the Defence
3. The Moral Case for the Social Sciences
Conclusion
เกี่ยวกับผู้แต่ง
Karl Spracklen is a Professor of Leisure Studies at Leeds Beckett University, UK. He is an active scholar in leisure studies, sociology and music studies. He was Chair of the Leisure Studies Association, and is the author of over seventy publications, including Whiteness and Leisure (2013), and Digital Leisure (2015).