Federalism—including its meanings and limits—remains one of the most contested principles in constitutional law. To fully understand its importance, we must turn to a landmark decision nearly two centuries old. M’Culloch v. Maryland (1819) is widely regarded as the Supreme Court’s most important and influential decision—one that essentially defined the nature and scope of federal authority and its relationship to the states. Mark Killenbeck’s sharply insightful study helps us understand why.
Killenbeck recounts how the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States refused to pay Maryland’s tax on the bank and how that act precipitated a showdown in the Supreme Court, which addressed two questions: whether the U.S. Congress had the authority to establish a national bank and whether Maryland’s tax on the bank was barred by the Constitution. In one of Chief Justice John Marshall’s most famous opinions, the Court unanimously answered yes to both, authorizing the federal government to exercise powers not expressly articulated in the Constitution—and setting an alarming precedent for states—rights advocates.
The issues at the heart of M’Culloch are as important today as they were then: the nature and scope of federal constitutional authority, the division of authority between federal and state governments, and the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting and applying the Constitution. Situating the case within the protracted debate about the bank and about federal-state relations, the Panic of 1819, the fate of the Second Bank following the Court’s momentous decision, and the ever-expanding and increasingly contentious debate over slavery, Killenbeck’s book provides a virtual constitutional history of the first fifty years of the nation. As such, it shows that the development of the Constitution as a viable governing document took place over time and that M’Culloch, with its very broad reading of federal power, marked a turning point for the Constitution, the Court, and the nation.
As the Court continues to reshape the boundaries of federal power, M’Culloch looms large as a precedent in a debate that has never been fully settled. And as states today grapple with such questions as abortion, gay rights, medical marijuana, or assisted suicide, this book puts that precedent in perspective and offers a firm grasp of its implications for the future.
สารบัญ
Editors’ Preface
Acknowledgments
Prologue
1. The Constitution and the First Bank
2. The Life and Death of the First Bank
3. The Rise of the Second Bank
4. A Court for a Nation
5. M’Culloch: The Case and the Argument
6. The Decision
7. The Decision Defended
8. The Nation Reacts
9. The Second Bank: Redemption and Reunion
10. Mc Culloch Triumphant
Epilogue
Chronology
Bibliographical Essay
Index
เกี่ยวกับผู้แต่ง
Mark R. Killenbeck is Wylie H. Davis Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Arkansas. His articles have appeared in journals such as the Supreme Court Review, California Law Review, and Michigan Law Review.
หนังสืออิเล็กทรอนิกส์เพิ่มเติมจากผู้แต่งคนเดียวกัน / บรรณาธิการ
12,407 หนังสืออิเล็กทรอนิกส์ในหมวดหมู่นี้
