Antirealist views about morality claim that moral facts or truths do not exist. Do these views imply that other types of normative facts, such as epistemic ones, do not exist? The Normative Web develops a positive answer to this question. Terence Cuneo argues that the similarities between moral and epistemic facts provide excellent reason to believe that, if moral facts do not exist, then epistemic facts do not exist. But epistemic facts, it is argued, do exist:to deny their existence would commit us to an extreme version of epistemological skepticism. Therefore, Cuneo concludes, moral facts exist. And if moral facts exist, then moral realism is true. In so arguing, Cuneo provides not simply a defense of moral realism, but a positive argument for it. Moreover, this argument engages with a wide range of antirealist positions in epistemology such as error theories, expressivist views, and reductionist views of epistemic reasons. If the central argument of The Normative Web is correct, antirealist positions of these varieties come at a very high cost. Given their cost, Cuneo contends, we should find realism about both epistemic and moralfacts highly attractive.
Terence Cuneo
Normative Web [PDF ebook]
An Argument for Moral Realism
Normative Web [PDF ebook]
An Argument for Moral Realism
ซื้อ eBook เล่มนี้และรับฟรีอีก 1 เล่ม!
ภาษา อังกฤษ ● รูป PDF ● ISBN 9780191527371 ● สำนักพิมพ์ Clarendon Press ● การตีพิมพ์ 2007 ● ที่สามารถดาวน์โหลดได้ 6 ครั้ง ● เงินตรา EUR ● ID 2272997 ● ป้องกันการคัดลอก Adobe DRM
ต้องใช้เครื่องอ่านหนังสืออิเล็กทรอนิกส์ที่มีความสามารถ DRM