The Historiographical Jesus introduces a new theory and approach for studying the life of Jesus. Anthony Le Donne uses the precepts of social memory theory to identify ‘memory refraction’ in the Jesus tradition–the refocusing distortion that occurs as the stories and sayings of Jesus were handed down and consciously and unconsciously framed in new settings with new applications. Recognition of this refraction allows historians to escape the problematic dichotomy between memory and typology. The author focuses on the title ‘Son of David’ as it was used in Jewish and Christian traditions to demonstrate both how his new theory functions and to advance historical Jesus research.
Зміст
I. Introduction
1 The Problem of New Testament Types
2 Historiography: Where to Begin?
3 Thesis and Delimitation
II. Hermeneutics and History
1 Interpreting Interpretation
III. History and Memory
1 Social Memory Theory
2 Memory versus Commemoration
IV. Memory and Typology
1 Social Memory: An Adaptation
2 Historical Method
3 Conclusion
V. Son of David and Typology
1 Son of David in the Hebrew Bible
2 Psalm of Solomon 17
VI. The Therapeutic Son of David
1 The Background(s) for Jesus’ Therapeutic Activity
2 Matthew’s Portrayal of the Son of David
3 Jesus as Solomonic Exorcist
Excursus: The Presupposition of Davidic Descent
VII. Jesus’ Temple Procession
1 Memory versus Invention
2 Mark 11 and Scripture
3 The Dead Sea Scrolls’ Davidic Offspring
4 Matthew’s Zechariah Localization
5 The Procession in Historical Memory
VIII. The Son of David-Question
1 Mk 12:35-7 and the Problem of Origin
2 Psalm 110
3 Psalm 110 in Markan Context
4 Historical Analysis
5 Conclusion
IX. Concluding Analysis
1 The Mnemonic Cycle
2 The Typological Cycle
3 Diachronic Continuity
4 Historical Memory
5 Conclusion
Про автора
Anthony Le Donne is Associate Professor of New Testament at United Theological Seminary.