PSYCHOLOGY AND THE LAW
Discover first-hand insights into the experience of acting as a psychologist expert witness
In Psychology and the Law: Case Studies of Expert Witnesses, a team of distinguished psychologists delivers an insightful and practical collection of case studies exploring the role of mental health professionals acting as expert witnesses in regulatory, judicial, and quasi-judicial proceedings. Each chapter is authored by an expert in their field, covering situations ranging from the assessment of people involved in criminal and family law proceedings and Parole Board hearings to the assessment of a civil litigant’s experience of historical trauma resulting from the alleged negligence of the local authority.
Each case follows the involvement of the practitioner from initial retainer to the process of giving evidence in court or in a court-like proceeding. The book also offers valuable judicial and legal perspectives on the roles played by mental health professionals acting as expert witnesses, as well as discussion of the cross examination of persons giving psychological evidence.
Readers will also find:
* A thorough introduction to the use of psychologists as expert witnesses
* Comprehensive explorations of clinical forensic expert witness case studies
* Practical discussions of medicolegal expert witness case studies
* Fulsome treatments of judicial and legal perspectives on the roles, uses, and limits of psychological evidence and the use of psychologist experts in military court martials
Perfect for undergraduate and postgraduate students of law and psychology, Psychology and the Law: Case Studies of Expert Witnesses will also benefit qualified psychologists, psychiatrists, lawyers, policymakers and legislators, social workers, and members of the judiciary.
Зміст
About the Editors
About the Contributors
Foreword
Acknowledgments
PART I Introduction
1. Psychologists as expert witnesses
Leam A. Craig, Hugh C. H. Koch, and Gus A. Baker
PART II Clinical Forensic Expert Witness Case Studies
2. Assessment of an adult male with sexual offence convictions
Leam A. Craig and Martin Rettenberger
3.Assessment of a female patient diagnosed with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder for a First-Tier Tribunal (Mental Health)
Estelle Moore and Harry Wood
4. Assessment of defendant involved in sexual homicide trial
Derek Perkins
5. A disputed confession in the House of Lord: Evidence-based practice
Gisli H. Gudjonsson
6. Assessment of male perpetrator of domestic violence in the family courts
Leam A. Craig
7. Assessment of suspected parental alienation in the family courts
Sue Whitcombe
8. ‘I suddenly remembered the same man had raped me too’: An empirically evidenced case of recovered traumatic memories
David V. Glasgow
9. Children and young people with special educational needs in first-tier special educational needs and disability tribunal hearings
Michael H. Hymans
10. Ethnic and cultural considerations in an expert witness assessment
Agatha Benyera Mararike
11. Assessing the communication needs of a vulnerable defendant with intellectual disabilities
Brendan M. O’Mahony
PART III Medicolegal Expert Witness Case Studies
12. Assessment in civil litigation and personal injury: A case study
Hugh C. Koch
13. Neuropsychological assessment of malingering in a suspected brain injury in civil litigation
Gus A. Baker and Steve Kemp
14. Assessing the impact of historical trauma in civil litigation of negligence against the local authority
Roger Hutchinson
PART IV Judicial and Legal Perspectives
15. ‘Trust Me, I’m an Expert!’: Legal and Professional Standards, Liability and the Expert Witness
Kieran Lee Marshall
16. The role of the psychologist on Parole Board Panels
Wendy Morgan, Claire Barker, and Helen Tinder
17. Tips for managing the cross examination of psychological evidence, and possible pitfalls
Leslie Cuthbert
18. A judicial perspective on hearing psychological evidence in the Family Courts
HHJ Stephen Wildblood KC and Freda Gardner
19. The role of the expert in regulatory disciplinary cases
Kenneth Hamer
20. Forensic psychology in military courts
Christopher T. Stein
21. How expert witness evidence can go wrong: A concluding note
Leam A. Craig, Hugh C. Koch, and Gus A. Baker
Acknowledgements
Про автора
Leam A. Craig, Ph D, is a Consultant Forensic and Clinical Psychologist and Partner at Forensic Psychology Practice Ltd. He is a Professor and Visiting Chair of Forensic Psychology at the University of Lincoln, UK, a Visiting Professor of Forensic Clinical Psychology at Birmingham City University, UK, and an Honorary Professor of Forensic Psychology at the Centre for Applied Psychology at the University of Birmingham, UK.
Hugh C.H. Koch, Ph D, is a chartered clinical psychologist and Visiting Professor on Law and Psychology at Birmingham City University, and visiting Professor in Psychology at Bristol University. He is the M.D. of Hugh Koch Associates, a medico-legal firm providing expert psychological reports in civil claims across the United Kingdom.
Gus A. Baker, Ph D, is a Consultant Clinical Neuropsychologist and Professor Emeritus of Clinical Neuropsychology. He is the Managing Director of Tribune Psychology Services and currently holds the post of Secretary General of the International Bureau for Epilepsy.
Більше електронних книг того самого автора / Редактор
77 260 Електронні книги в цій категорі
