In the satirical work ‘Medicina Flagellata; Or, The Doctor Scarify’d, ‘ the anonymous author employs a biting wit to critique the medical practices of the 17th century. The book deftly blends prose and verse, utilizing clever allegories and vivid imagery to deconstruct the medical profession’s pretensions and perceived incompetence. Set against a backdrop of burgeoning medical science, the text serves both as a moral commentary and a humorous examination of the doctors of its time, challenging the authority and methodologies that led to both miraculous cures and dismal failures. The anonymity of the author adds an intriguing layer to the text, suggesting a possible insider perspective on the medical community, perhaps stemming from personal experiences or observations. The author’s choice to remain unnamed may indicate a desire to protect oneself from the backlash that such a scathing critique could provoke within the tightly-knit medical circle of the time. This anonymity compels readers to focus on the content of the critique rather than the credentials of its creator. ‘Medicina Flagellata’ is recommended for readers interested in early medical history, satire, and the evolution of professional standards in medicine. It invites reflection on the ongoing dialogue between medical practitioners and the public, ensuring its relevance remains timeless.