When protests erupted in response to the 2010 Egyptian parliament elections that were widely viewed as fraudulent, many wondered. Why now? Voters had never witnessed free and fair elections in the past, so why did these elicit such an outcry? To answer this question, Weipert-Fenner conducted the first study of politics in modern Egypt from a parliamentary perspective. Contrary to the prevailing opinion that autocratic parliaments are meaningless, token institutions, Weipert-Fenner’s long-term analysis shows that parliament can be an indicator, catalyst, and agent of change in an authoritarian regime.
Comparing parliamentary dynamics over decades, Weipert-Fenner demonstrates that autocratic parliaments can grow stronger within a given political system. They can also become contentious when norms regarding policies, political actors, and institutions are violated on a large scale and/or at a fast pace. Most importantly, a parliament can even turn against the executive when parliamentary rights are withdrawn or when widely shared norms are violated. These and other recurrent patterns of institutional relations identified in The Autocratic Parliament help explain long spans of stable, yet never stagnant, authoritarian rule in colonial and postcolonial periods alike, as well as the different types of regime change that Egypt has witnessed: those brought about by external intervention, by revolution, or by military coup.
Giới thiệu về tác giả
Irene Weipert-Fenner is a senior research fellow at the Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF). In 2019 she served as a visiting professor of Middle Eastern politics at Philipps-University Marburg, Germany. She is the coeditor of
Clientelism and Patronage in the Middle East and North Africa: Networks of Dependency and
Socioeconomic Protests in MENA and Latin America: Egypt and Tunisia in Interregional Comparison.
Thêm sách điện tử từ cùng một tác giả / Biên tập viên
114.747 Ebooks trong thể loại này
