Interprofessional Rehabilitation: a Person-Centred Approach is a concise and readable introduction to the principles and practice of a person-centred interprofessional approach to rehabilitation, based upon a firm scientific evidence base.
Written by a multi-contributor team of specialists in physiotherapy, occupational therapy, nursing, psychology and rehabilitation medicine, this text draws together common themes that cut across the different professional groups and the spectrum of health conditions requiring rehabilitation, and sets out a model of practice that is tailored to the specific needs of the client. Showing interprofessionalism at work in a range of clinical contexts, the book argues that effective rehabilitation is best conducted by well-integrated teams of specialists working in an interdisciplinary way, with the client or patient actively involved in all stages of the process.
This book will be essential reading for students preparing for practice in an increasingly interprofessional environment, and will be of interest to any health care practitioner keen to understand how an integrated approach to rehabilitation can benefit their clients.
Mục lục
About the editors
About the contributors
Foreword
Preface
Acknowledgements
1 Introduction
Richard J. Siegert, William J. Taylor and Sarah G. Dean
1.1 What is rehabilitation?
1.2 Setting boundaries – or what we don’t mean by rehabilitation
1.3 Some definitions of rehabilitation
1.4 Some other issues in defining rehabilitation
1.5 The core themes
1.6 A word about terminology
1.7 Summary
2 A rehabilitation framework: the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
William J. Taylor and Szilvia Geyh
2.1 There is a need for a common language of functioning
2.2 The ICF is both a model and a classification system
2.3 The origins of the ICF
2.4 Using the ICF in practice – ICF core sets, rehabilitation cycle and ICF tools
2.5 Can the ICF be used to measure functioning – both the ‘what’ and the ‘how’? Controversies – to measure or to classify that is the question
2.6 Controversies – classification of ‘participation restrictions’ versus ‘activity limitations’
2.7 Controversies – is the ICF a framework for understanding ‘Qo L’?
2.8 Future developments of the ICF
3 An interprofessional approach to rehabilitation
Sarah G. Dean and Claire Ballinger
3.1 Introduction and setting the scene
3.2 Terminology and interprofessional working within rehabilitation
3.3 Characteristics of good teamwork
3.4 Team membership and roles
3.5 Processes of teamwork
3.6 The role of interprofessional education in rehabilitation
3.7 Collaborative rehabilitation research
3.8 The future for interprofessional rehabilitation teams
3.9 Conclusion
4 Processes in rehabilitation
William Levack and Sarah G. Dean
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Assessment
4.3 Goal planning
4.4 Interventions
4.5 Evaluation
4.6 Discharge planning and transitions from hospital to community
4.7 Conclusion
5 Outcome measurement in rehabilitation
Richard J. Siegert and Jo Adams
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Psychometrics – a primer
5.3 Applying outcome measures in clinical practice
5.4 Conclusion
6 The person in context
Julie Pryor and Sarah G. Dean
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Who are the stakeholders in rehabilitation?
6.3 Key terms
6.4 The lived experience of acquired disability
6.5 Rehabilitation as a personal journey of reconstruction or transformation of the self
6.6 Understanding rehabilitation as ‘work’ and the role of participation
6.7 Clinical services guiding and supporting personal rehabilitation journeys
6.8 Placing the person in their family context and involving families in rehabilitation
6.9 Ideas for making clinical rehabilitation processes and practices person-centred
6.10 Can we do person-centred rehabilitation?
7 Conclusion: rethinking rehabilitation
Sarah G. Dean, Richard J. Siegert and William J. Taylor
7.1 Introduction
7.2 The ICF as a theoretical framework and language for rehabilitation
7.3 Interprofessional teamwork in rehabilitation
7.4 Processes in rehabilitation: goal setting and its mediators
7.5 Outcome measurement to evaluate rehabilitation and show it makes a difference
7.6 The importance of the individual person in their context and how to do person-centred rehabilitation
7.7 Using the ICF as a way to map interprofessional rehabilitation
7.8 Revisiting the definition of rehabilitation
7.9 Limitations related to the scope of this textbook
7.10 Future directions of interprofessional rehabilitation
7.11 Conclusion
Index
Giới thiệu về tác giả
About the Editors
Sarah G Dean is a senior lecturer in health services
research, based at the University of Exeter, UK, with a background
in physiotherapy and health psychology. She has a particular
interest in the psychology of exercise-based rehabilitation for
people with long term conditions.
Richard J Siegert has a background in clinical psychology
and neuropsychology and a special interest in the application of
psychometrics to measurement in rehabilitation settings. A Reader
in Rehabilitation at King’s College London, he is soon to
take up a Chair in Psychology and Rehabilitation at AUT University
in Auckland, New Zealand.
William J Taylor is an academic rehabilitation physician
and rheumatologist in Wellington, New Zealand, where he teaches a
postgraduate interdisciplinary course in rehabilitation and
continues to work at the coal-face of clinical practice.