The Passing of Postmodernism addresses the increasingly prevalent assumption that a period marked by poststructuralism and metafiction has passed and that literature and film are once again engaging sincerely with issues of ethics and politics. In discussions of various twentieth- and twenty-first-century writers, directors, and theorists—from Michel Foucault and Slavoj Žižek to Thomas Pynchon and David Lynch—Josh Toth demonstrates that a certain utopian spirit persisted within, and actually defined, the postmodern project. Just as modernism was animated by an idealistic belief that it could finally realize the utopia beckoning on the horizon, postmodernism was compelled by an equally utopian belief that it could finally reject the possibility of all such illusory ideals. Toth argues that this specter of an impossible future is and must remain both possible and impossible, a ghostly promise of what is always still to come.
Josh Toth teaches literature and critical theory at Grant Mac Ewan College and is coeditor (with Neil Brooks) of The Mourning After: Attending the Wake of Postmodernism.
表中的内容
Acknowledgments
1.The Phantom Project Returning: The Passing (On) of the Still Incomplete Project of Modernity
Introduction
Ruptures and Specters
Exorcisms Without End
The (Phantom) Project Still Incomplete
2. Spectral Circumventions (of the Specter): Poststructuralism, Derrida, and the Project Renewed
Poststructuralism and/as Postmodernism
Private Irony All the Way Down?
The Force of Derrida’s Indecision
3. Writing of the Ghost (Again): The Failure of Postmodern
Metafiction and the Narrative of Renewalism
Neither Logocentric nor Logo Centric
From an Ethics of Perversity to an Ethics of Indecision
Metafiction’s Failure and the Rise of Neo-Realism
The Project of Renewalism
A Conclusion . . . Perhaps
Notes
Works Cited
Index
关于作者
Josh Toth teaches literature and critical theory at Grant Mac Ewan University and is coeditor (with Neil Brooks) of
The Mourning After: Attending the Wake of Postmodernism.