Could all or part of our taken-as-established scientific conclusions, theories, experimental data, ontological commitments, and so forth have been significantly different? Science as It Could Have Been focuses on a crucial issue that contemporary science studies have often neglected: the issue of contingency within science. It considers a number of case studies, past and present, from a wide range of scientific disciplines—physics, biology, geology, mathematics, and psychology—to explore whether components of human science are inevitable, or if we could have developed an alternative successful science based on essentially different notions, conceptions, and results. Bringing together a group of distinguished contributors in philosophy, sociology, and history of science, this edited volume offers a comprehensive analysis of the contingency/inevitability problem and a lively and up-to-date portrait of current debates in science studies.
关于作者
<b>Lena Soler (Editor) </b><br> <b>Léna Soler</b> is associate professor of philosophy of science at the University of Lorraine. She is the author of <i>Introduction à l’épistémologie</i> and editor of <i>Science after the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science</i>.<br><br><b>Emiliano Trizio (Editor) </b><br> <b>Emiliano Trizio</b> is an instructor of philosophy of science at Seattle University.<br><br><b>Andrew Pickering (Editor) </b><br> <b>Andrew Pickering</b> is professor of sociology and philosophy at the University of Exeter. He is the author of <i>Constructing Quarks, The Mangle of Practice</i>, and <i>The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future.</i><br><br>
来自同一作者的更多电子书 / 编辑
87,636 此类电子书
