Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however, some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners, while others reject reliable evidence that is unreasonably portrayed as full of holes. Seeking a balance between undue deference and undeserved skepticism, Caudill and La Rue draw on the philosophy of science to help judges, juries, and advocates better understand its goals and limitations.
Cumpărați această carte electronică și primiți încă 1 GRATUIT!
Limba Engleză ● Format EPUB ● ISBN 9781461640363 ● Editura Rowman & Littlefield Publishers ● Publicat 2006 ● Descărcabil 6 ori ● Valută EUR ● ID 2757931 ● Protecție împotriva copiilor Adobe DRM
Necesită un cititor de ebook capabil de DRM