Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however, some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners, while others reject reliable evidence that is unreasonably portrayed as full of holes. Seeking a balance between undue deference and undeserved skepticism, Caudill and La Rue draw on the philosophy of science to help judges, juries, and advocates better understand its goals and limitations.
Mua cuốn sách điện tử này và nhận thêm 1 cuốn MIỄN PHÍ!
Ngôn ngữ Anh ● định dạng EPUB ● ISBN 9781461640363 ● Nhà xuất bản Rowman & Littlefield Publishers ● Được phát hành 2006 ● Có thể tải xuống 6 lần ● Tiền tệ EUR ● TÔI 2757931 ● Sao chép bảo vệ Adobe DRM
Yêu cầu trình đọc ebook có khả năng DRM