Why do most welfare applicants fail to challenge adverse decisions despite a continuing sense of need?
The book addresses this severely under-researched and under-theorised question. Using English homelessness law as their case study, the authors explore why homeless applicants did — but more often did not — challenge adverse decisions by seeking internal administrative review. They draw out from their data a list of the barriers to the take up of grievance rights. Further, by combining extensive interview data from aggrieved homeless applicants with ethnographic data about bureaucratic decision-making, they are able to situate these barriers within the dynamics of the citizen-bureaucracy relationship. Additionally, they point to other contexts which inform applicants” decisions about whether to request an internal review. Drawing on a diverse literature — risk, trust, audit, legal consciousness, and complaints — the authors lay the foundations for our understanding of the (non-)emergence of administrative disputes.
Professor David Cowan & Professor Simon Halliday
The Appeal of Internal Review [PDF ebook]
Law, Administrative Justice and the (Non-) Emergence of Disputes
The Appeal of Internal Review [PDF ebook]
Law, Administrative Justice and the (Non-) Emergence of Disputes
购买此电子书可免费获赠一本!
格式 PDF ● 网页 232 ● ISBN 9781847312389 ● 出版者 Bloomsbury Publishing ● 发布时间 2003 ● 下载 3 时 ● 货币 EUR ● ID 5766378 ● 复制保护 Adobe DRM
需要具备DRM功能的电子书阅读器